Re: ADs speaking for "their" WGs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/20/2007 08:35 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> It seems fairly clear in RFC 2418 section 6.1:
> 
>   "The Chair has the responsibility and the authority to make decisions,
>    on behalf of the working group, regarding all matters of working
>    group process and staffing, in conformance with the rules of the
>    IETF.  The AD has the authority and the responsibility to assist in
>    making those decisions at the request of the Chair or when
>    circumstances warrant such an intervention."
> 
> So the AD *does* have authority *when circumstances warrant*, but
> only on matters of process and staffing. I'm sure Jeff Schiller didn't
> mean any more than that - this rule doesn't allow an AD to take
> technical decisions unilaterally, but does allow an AD to make a
> consensus call if for some reason the WG Chairs can't do so. (And
> all subject to the regular appeal process, of course.)

My recollection is that Jeff made a technical decision and announced
it, because everyone agreed the process was deadlocked.  I don't
recall that he ever "took over" for a WG chair, but there was
agreement that the WG was stuck and a decision was required.

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]