Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Ok. But let me clarify my question. I was specifically after "running > code" that > has worked well in some case, and not so much specific new text. (Running > code would show that at least some open source project was OK with the > license and that at least some specific set of company lawyers were OK with > making such a license.) Oh, I see. As far as company lawyers, I can think of RedHat's patent policy: http://www.redhat.com/legal/patent_policy.html I realize that this is not a 'Patent License' but rather a 'Promise not to enforce', but the end result for free software developers is the same, I think. I do not know which patents RedHat owns or whether there is any free software that depends on this promise, though. /Simon _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf