On 2007-04-11 11:34, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Just one comment:
Brian E Carpenter writes:
On 2007-04-11 10:08, Simon Josefsson wrote:
What typically happens in practice, among good-faith
practitioners, is that there won't be any GPL (or Apache, or
Mozilla, or ...) implementation of the patented technology at all,
because the necessary rights cannot be acquired.
Doesn't that sound like a bug in the OSS licenses to you, assuming the
desired result is to make the Internet work better?
In this kind of situation, what would _you_ choose?
[ ] Apply for an IPR license/sign an NDA/do other paperwork
[ ] Violate someone's something
[ ] Go do something else
My choice tends to be the last, because my goal is generally not to
implement some specific technology, it is to increase people's happiness
and productivity. I can do that by implementing whatever Mark has
patented. Or in any of ten thousand other ways. See?
[X] Use a different OSS license that doesn't have this perceived problem.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf