> From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>
> IMHO, there's something fundamentally wrong with any IETF working group
> that's not willing to learn about IPv6.
On the other hand, maybe they are just recognizing reality - something much
of the rest of the IETF seems stubbornly determined to ignore.
> IPv6 is not a specialized topic, it's the layer common to all parts of
> the emerging Internet.
Case in point....
I ought to adopt a .sig:
"Number of decades since formal adoption of IPv6: N",
where of course currently N=1.2 (since SIPP was selected as IPng at the July,
1994, IETF). So, exactly how large does N have to get before the
ludicrousness level gets high enough to overwhelm the refusal to admit
reality?
If IPv6 were a drug, it would likely have been outlawed, it's (seemingly) so
mind-altering and addictive.
Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf