Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Brian" == Brian E Carpenter <brc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

    Brian> This is a personal draft written following some discussion
    Brian> in the recent General Area open meeting. Comments welcome.
    Brian> I am already aware that it needs to be reconciled with
    Brian> http://www.ietf.org/IESG/STATEMENTS/statement-disruptive-posting.txt


I'm not sure much reconciliation is required.  I'd certainly prefer
non-normative reconciliation --saying something like "Non-working group lists are not currently covered by BCP; see this statement for the procedures at the time of approval at this draft," to normative reconciliation.

My preference stems from a desire to make as few changes as possible.
If the community wants to normatively define non-working-group lists
and can come to consensus on this, that would be fine too.

--Sam


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]