Sam Hartman wrote:
"Brian" == Brian E Carpenter <brc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:Brian> This is a personal draft written following some discussion Brian> in the recent General Area open meeting. Comments welcome. Brian> I am already aware that it needs to be reconciled with Brian> http://www.ietf.org/IESG/STATEMENTS/statement-disruptive-posting.txt I'm not sure much reconciliation is required. I'd certainly prefer non-normative reconciliation --saying something like "Non-working group lists are not currently covered by BCP; see this statement for the procedures at the time of approval at this draft," to normative reconciliation.
I agree with that - that was about all I had in mind.
My preference stems from a desire to make as few changes as possible. If the community wants to normatively define non-working-group lists and can come to consensus on this, that would be fine too.
Quite so. I regrad that as in scope for the effort Jim Galvin kicked off before Montreal. Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf