On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > On 25-jun-2006, at 6:18, Keith Moore wrote: > > > Trouble is, in our current process, there's rarely any formal request > > for feedback, and little external visibility of a WG's output, until > > Last Call. > > But I see your point. When I first attended an IETF meeting I was > surprised to see how inward looking wgs are. There is very little, if > any, effort to present what the working group is doing to people outside > of the wg. I guess that if people are interested in the WG then they will participate, or at least read the drafts as they come up in the i-d announcement list. You can't force volunteers to take an interest. Perhaps requirements documents should be more like rationale documents: "we chose to solve this problem in this way because of this"... Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> http://dotat.at/ SOUTHEAST ICELAND: SOUTH VEERING SOUTHWEST 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 IN NORTH. RAIN AT TIMES. MODERATE OR GOOD. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf