Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24 Jun 2006 10:58:31 -0000
John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >  Such as, a requirement for formal cross-area review of the design
> > goals document and of preliminary specifications as a prerequisite
> > before producing a reference implementation.
> 
> The IETF standards process is already so slow and uncertain that
> people throw up their hands in exasperation and go around it.

True.  Which is why it's necessary to handle the reviews in a pipelined rather than a stop-and-wait fashion.  But part of the reason IETF's process is so slow is that the 
only meaningful checks we place are at the end - so a working group typically labors to the point of exhaustion without having received any external feedback, so when the feedback does arrive the working group is so dysfunctional that it's nearly incapable of fixing anything (and it is often in denial about what is wrong).  Providing more early feedback will speed up the process rather than slow it down.

Keith

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]