Re: Fostering reviews (was Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




El 26/06/2006, a las 10:49, Dave Crocker escribió:



marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
The "incentive" that something like SIRS offered was classification as a senior contributor. This was neither a small point nor a small benefit (IMO).

what was the benefit of becoming a senior contributor?

Idealistic answer: The personal satisfaction of meaningful contribution. (There is a rumor that active IETF participants are highly motivated by this goal. So, the incentive is provide explicit satisfaction of it beyond their
narrow areas of primary activity.)

Selfish: Public recognition. (Good for both one's ego and potentially one's
employment status.)


ok, may make sense

how would this differ from the "technical advisor" title?

Regards, marcelo



d/

ps. The ideal and the selfish are complementary and not at all negative, IMO. But, then, I believe all idealism is driven by a form of self-satisfaction...



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]