El 26/06/2006, a las 9:56, Dave Crocker escribió:
marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
I don't know about "narrow community", but I agree that good reviews
are essential. ...
In my opinion, if the IETF could make it worth someone's while in one
way or another to do a thorough review, that would help a lot.
I very much agree with this
I think this is the way to improve quality
there have been some initiatives for this, see
http://www.watersprings.org/pub/id/draft-handley-doc-market-00.txt
but i
guess it didn't progress...
we should try to figure out some mechanisms to foster reviews... do
you
have any ideas?
The first effort was the SIRS project, that was declared a failure
after only 4
months (most of which were during the summer) in spite of recruiting a
substantial list of highly experienced participants. The second was a
working
group that took a year to develop a scheme that was essentially
identical to
sirs, but did a nice job of dissipating community energy for the
effort.
too bad... perhaps we should try another effort in this area... but we
should wait for the summer to end this time...
The "incentive" that something like SIRS offered was classification as
a senior
contributor. This was neither a small point nor a small benefit (IMO).
what was the benefit of becoming a senior contributor?
Thanks, marcelo
d/
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf