Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Friday, June 23, 2006 05:24:11 PM -0400 Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:18:40 -0400
"Burger, Eric" <eburger@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I would offer that in *some* groups the running code bar is reasonable.

I would have little objection to requiring running code as a test of
feasibility of a new idea.  I would object strongly to an argument that
just because someone has running code, means it's a good indication of
adequacy of the protocol.

Specific examples aside, I agree. Running code should be a necessary condition for something to progress, but not a sufficient one.

-- Jeffrey T. Hutzelman (N3NHS) <jhutz+@xxxxxxx>
  Sr. Research Systems Programmer
  School of Computer Science - Research Computing Facility
  Carnegie Mellon University - Pittsburgh, PA


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]