Hi Jari, > Anyway, I agree with Dave Crocker that the bar should be > higher for using "there's another solution" argument in last > call discussion of chartered work than in, say, a BOF > discussion. Perhaps we should focus more on whether > the function itself is something that we agree on, and > what we can do to fix/scope/help PANA. That's very true given that some solutions that were mentioned in the discussion appeared recently while the PANA protocol was in AD Evaluation for a long time already. One example: draft-barany-eap-gee-00.txt Ciao Hannes _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf