Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I have other security-related issues on NACP.  My view is that secure
> enhancement of NACP will be equivalent to the EAP over UDP protocol
> the IETF is standardizing, PANA.

Can you describe why the security of PANA is better than EAP over UDP 
(NACP)?  I had thought that they were more or less equivalent, since 
neither approach mandates protection. 

But maybe I am missing something? 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]