Note:
The IPOD draft says that these notes can be approved by multiple
entities - I did not see any reason to insist that the mechanism impose
a further burden on the IESG for *every* document that needs to be
issued in the course of IETF operations.
So the reason for the "IETF" in "IETF Operational Notes" is "related to
the IETF", not "approved by the IETF".
Much like the way "Internet Engineering Task Force" is related to the
Internet, not approved by the Internet......
Harald
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf