RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Right. I am proposing the addition of "(Informative)" after the KeyNote section title. Also, I proposed assigning the KeyNote code point from the "specification required" set of numbers instead of the set that is associated with standards track documents.

Russ

At 11:07 AM 5/24/2006, Stephen Kent wrote:
Russ,

I concur with Pasi's observations. I don't recall seeing a similar structure in an RFC, where a part is informative, in what is otherwise a standards track document.

Steve



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]