--On Tuesday, 23 May, 2006 11:17 +0200 Lars Eggert
<lars.eggert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> John,
>
> On May 23, 2006, at 1:09, John C Klensin wrote:
>> So, from my perspective, that one-week buffer (or at least a
>> four or five day one exclusive of possible travel time) is
>> needed if I am to actively participate in two nearly-adjacent
>> meetings.
>
> I realize people are different. For me - and I guess for Dan -
> the additional travel time (each intercontinental flight
> kills a day) and jet lag associated with spaced-out meetings
> are worse.
That is fairly bad for me as well. For meetings on a different
continent than mine, but spaced out by a week or less, I
seriously consider just staying rather than coming home and
going again. But I still need a significant break between the
meetings... perhaps it is another sign of the onset of old age.
>> If I were going to one or both meetings just to sit
>> there, rather than being actively and intensely involved, it
>> would be different and I'd want the meetings as close together
>> as possible.
>
> Few of us have the luxury of going to meetings "just to sit
> there."
I did not intend to attribute that luxury to either of you or
anyone else in particular.
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf