Craig Partridge wrote:
* section 2, 2nd para "This draft only addresses those documents
published by the IETF family. These include IETF documents processed
by the IESG, IAB documents, and IRTF documents processed by the IRSG."
I don't think the IAB and IRSG are part of the IETF family. If they
are part of a family, it would be ISOC. So I'd just say "This draft
only addresses IETF documents processed by the IESG."
The IRTF certainly used to be parallel to, and independent of, the
IETF. However, that has changed.
In terms of both public perceptions and community operational
interactions, the term "IETF" now subsumes classic IETF components, as
well as the IAB and the IRTF.
On the other hand, your proposed language change probably characterizes
this particular document more accurately.
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf