On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 09:05 +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:01:50PM -0700, > David W. Hankins <David_Hankins@xxxxxxx> wrote > a message of 56 lines which said: > > > It would certainly be strange, at the IETF, for anyone to suggest > > using a technology that is known to be pervasively deployed and > > functional. > > Atom (RFC 4287) and the various RSS (which one to use, by the way?) > are deployed and are functional. For RSS the one that Feed Validator likes, for draft/RFC annnounces, check: http://community.unfix.org/feeds/ No per-user-subscribe yet though, as I unfortunatly broke my right shoulder and that will take some time to mend and typing with one hand is not very speedy ;( Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf