Michel Py wrote: > That being said, I do acknowledge that larger companies such as global > ISPs do have a problem with the RFC1918 space being too small. This > brings the debate of what to do with class E, either make it extended > private space or make it global unicast. > I think we bite the bullet and go to IPv6. Screwing around with Class E address space at this late date is counterproductive. Say what you will about v6. It *does* have more bits. Eliot _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf