Re: Copyright status of early RFCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



bmanning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
 not being the RFC editor, the IAB (or member thereof), or even the
 (as yet undefinable) IETF, I am not sure I am qualified to render
 a value judgement here.  That said, I am in posession of two bound
 volumes of the collected RFC series as of the date of publication of
 said volumes (modulo delays from the time the collection(s) were assembled
 and the time they were published).  One is circa 1995 and the other is
 circa 1997  ...  and I know of at least one CD containing the RFC archives
 that has been sold.
The rules by which the IAB/IESG manage the IETF process have changed dramatically in the past four years... so what was once possible/encouraged seems now to be treated as suspect or illegal beahviour. Who knows if the ISOC/IAB/IESG folks are attempting to claim copywrite on old RFCs (which
 used to claim "Distribution Unlimited")...
I think it's much more a question of "we won't pay your lawyer's bills if someone sues you over this" than a desire to exert any form of control.

I think all the IAB, IESG, IETF trust etcetera WISH for all RFCs to be freely copyable in their entirety.

Unfortunately, wishes don't make it so.

                                 harald

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]