Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fully agree ;-)

Regards,
Jordi




> De: Scott W Brim <sbrim@xxxxxxxxx>
> Responder a: <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx>
> Fecha: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:25:31 -0500
> Para: Steve Silverman <steves@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
> Asunto: Re: About cookies and refreshments cost and abuse
> 
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 11:16:33AM -0500, Steve Silverman allegedly
> wrote:
>> In Paris, we switched to a late dinner  which was necessary in Paris
>> but we did this in Dallas.  Was this a general decision that I
>> missed?  I prefer dinner from 6 - 8 and a night session where the
>> local customs support this.  This might also cut down the need for
>> afternoon sugar consumption.
> 
> Oh good, this isn't about cookies anymore.  I for one was against
> using the Paris schedule in Dallas, but I came around quickly,
> especially with the -- do I have to say it? -- late afternoon cookies.
> I now think the new schedule is excellent and would like to see it at
> all future IETFs.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Slides available at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.




_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]