Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 04:21:31PM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Ray,
> 
> I think our goal is to not lose essential participants from the IETF due
> to clashes. In fact that's why we want to schedule several years out, so
> as to make it easier for many other organizations to do their scheduling.
> If we do that, it's each organization's choice whether or not they avoid 
> IETF
> weeks. (This week, for example, ITU-T NGN chose to schedule two major 
> meetings
> in other cities.)

	and how does one define "essectial participants"?


> I don't think it's discriminatory to put the NICs and NOGs that don't seem
> to have a large overlap with IETF participants in the second category. It's
> just a matter of practicality, given that optimal scheduling is a
> fundamentally imsoluble problem anyway. I'd be delighted to see growth in
> African participation in the IETF (the spreadsheet shows two people from
> Africa pre-registered this week).

	the same arguments could have been applied to europe
	15 years ago...  but they were not - 

--bill

> 
>     Brian
> 
> Ray Plzak wrote:
> >Why should AfriNIC be considered any less of an RIR than the other APNIC,
> >ARIN, LACNIC, or RIPE NCC(meeting is at RIPE meeting)? Why should AFNOG be
> >considered any less of an operator's forum than NANOG or EOF(meeting is at
> >RIPE meeting)? We are talking about an entire continent. It seems to me in
> >this case that the priority should be equality of treatment based on the
> >function being performed for a region and not any other perceived reason 
> >for
> >inequity. Or doesn't the IETF care about the Internet in the developing
> >regions of the world?
> >
> >Ray
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:joelja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >>Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 1:53 AM
> >>To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> >>Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: Re: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates
> >>
> >>yOn Fri, 24 Mar 2006, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi Ray,
> >>>
> >>>I know is difficult already to manage to avoid clashes, but I think is
> >>>unfair and discriminatory to have all the RIRs and *NOGs in the MUST NOT
> >>>list, but AfriNIC, AfNOG and SANOG in the other list.
> >>
> >>having attended two of three I would simply observe that the overlap
> >>between the two communites is a little lower. also. having attended every
> >>afnog meeting, it hasn't yet clashed with the ietf. You have to have some
> >>priorities.
> >>
> >>
> >>>Anticipating for so many years is good enough to allow all those
> >>>organizations to chat together and make sure the there is not a clash,
> >>
> >>not
> >>
> >>>just in the exact dates, but allowing a few days in between (if they are
> >>>hosted in different places of the world) to allow traveling among them,
> >>>which has not been the case up to now all the time.
> >>>
> >>>Regards,
> >>>Jordi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>De: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@xxxxxxxx>
> >>>>Responder a: <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx>
> >>>>Fecha: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:41:48 -0500
> >>>>Para: "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
> >>>>Asunto: Proposed 2008 - 2010 IETF Meeting dates
> >>>>
> >>>>The IETF is proposing dates for its meetings being held 2008 through
> >>>>2010.  Those dates can be found at
> >>>>http://www.ietf.org/meetings/future_meetings0810.html
> >>>>
> >>>>The dates will be evaluated and selected to meet the IETF's standards
> >>>>development objectives, while avoiding conflicts with SDOs and other
> >>>>organizations to the extent possible.  Those organizations can be found
> >>>>on the Clash List from the same url.
> >>>>
> >>>>Comments regarding these dates should be addressed to the IAD at
> >>>>iad@xxxxxxxxx
> >>>>
> >>>>It is anticipated that an official IETF Meeting Calendar for 2008 -
> >>
> >>2010
> >>
> >>>>will be formally adopted on April 20, 2006 by the IAOC.
> >>>>
> >>>>Regards
> >>>>Ray Pelletier
> >>>>IAD
> >>>>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>Ietf mailing list
> >>>>Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> >>>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>**********************************************
> >>>The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
> >>>
> >>>Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
> >>>Slides available at:
> >>>http://www.ipv6-es.com
> >>>
> >>>This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> >>
> >>confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
> >>individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
> >>that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> >>information, including attached files, is prohibited.
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Ietf mailing list
> >>>Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> >>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> >>>
> >>
> >>--
> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>Joel Jaeggli  	       Unix Consulting
> >>joelja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>GPG Key Fingerprint:     5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Ietf mailing list
> >>Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> >>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Ietf mailing list
> >Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux