We (Samsung) have an implementation as well. Alper > -----Original Message----- > From: Yoshihiro Ohba [mailto:yohba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 12:02 AM > To: Sam Hartman > Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pana-framework-06 > > If implementability of the specification is an issue, my company has > an implementation of bootstrapping 802.11i PSK mode based on running > PANA over Uncontrolled Port. The implementation works without > modifying a WiFi hardware or its firmware. We have a plan to publish > the source code of the implementation in Open Diameter project. > > Regards, > Yoshihiro Ohba > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:45:25AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > > >>>>> "Yoshihiro" == Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > e email discussion over > > Yoshihiro> the EAP mailing list quoted below, I had a short > > Yoshihiro> conversation on this issue with Jesse Walker during > > Yoshihiro> IEEE 802 interim meeting in January in order to > > Yoshihiro> follow-up the email discussion and understand the input > > Yoshihiro> from Jesse more. As far as I understand, he seemed to > > Yoshihiro> agree on this possible interpretation while he > > Yoshihiro> mentioned that there is no existing 802.11i > > Yoshihiro> implementation that uses 802.1X Uncontrolled Port for > > Yoshihiro> non-802.1X frame exchange, but I may be still > > Yoshihiro> misunderstanding something. Also, for the sake of > > Yoshihiro> completeness of the email discussion over the EAP > > Yoshihiro> mailing list, the following email that I sent in > > Yoshihiro> response to msg03872 should be quoted as well: > > Yoshihiro> http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/eap/msg03879.html.] > > > > > > So, the implementability of our specifications is a significant > > concern. If we do not expect there to be environments in which a > > feature of our spec will be implementable, then we should remove that > > feature. > > > > Implementability is sufficiently important that RFC 2026 explicitly > > gives the IESG the ability to request an implementation report even > > for publication at proposed standard when it has questions about > > whether a particular feature can be implemented interoperably. > > > > --Sam > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf