Re: STRAW PROPOSAL RFC Editor charter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tony,

>The point is that the past IESG practice which has driven out those who
>would submit individual submissions, resulting in the current ratios, MUST
>NOT become the guide for what SHOULD happen going forward.
>
Actually, RFC 3932 already makes it quite clear what the role
of the IETF and the IESG is in the individual submissions process.
My understanding is that this makes the IESG much less in charge
of what the individual submissions say than what the situation
was before. Basically, there's only a check for conflict between
the submission and IETF work. And obviously, non-IETF documents
get a note which clearly explains that the document is not
an output of the IETF.

So, I would actually expect the situation has improved since
the publication of RFC 3932. The rules seems clear and
fair to me. Tony, if you have had bad experiences, have they
been before or after RFC 3932?

--Jari


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]