In message <20060219013238.779CC22241D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Rescor la writes: > >Since the IETF would not have change control, this is an inappropriate >work item for the TLS WG and therefore the authors appear to have >decided on an Individual Submission. The reason for the intended status >of Proposed Standard Do we have a process issue here? Can we have a Proposed Standard without the IETF having change control? (2026 speaks of change control only in the context of a WG.) --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf