Steve & Eric:
The document that is in Last Call gives the IETF complete change
control. There is no process issue.
Russ
At 10:32 PM 2/18/2006, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message <20060219013238.779CC22241D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Eric Rescor
la writes:
>
>Since the IETF would not have change control, this is an inappropriate
>work item for the TLS WG and therefore the authors appear to have
>decided on an Individual Submission. The reason for the intended status
>of Proposed Standard
Do we have a process issue here? Can we have a Proposed Standard
without the IETF having change control? (2026 speaks of change control
only in the context of a WG.)
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf