hi frank, > Tschofenig, Hannes wrote: > > > The values listed in the "Location Types Registry" document > > are not displayed to the user. As such, we don't cover > > internationalization support. > > That wasn't clear from the draft under discussion. It should > get some "I18N considerations" explaining why that's no issue. we will reflect this aspect. > > > If there are better definitions please let us know. > > Maybe the WiKi dictionary has a category "location" (?) i search for a while and found interesting pages but unfortuately not related to this topic. i got the impression that some folks had very specific suggestions already in mind in order to provide constructive feedback. > > > We thought that FCFS would be an acceptable policy. Some > > people had a different view about it. > > Not limited to registration request DoS attacks on IANA, yes. > > > Fine. I have no problems changing it to expert review. > > Where do you expect to find volunteers for an expert review > of a location dictionary ? From two "expert review" lists I > know (langtags and charsets) one works at the moment, I'm > not sure about the other. > > "Expert review" is essentially a filter protecting IANA from > some really bad ideas, but it's also an exercise in TINSTAAFL > - set up mailing list, appoint reviewer, handle appeals, etc. do you think expert review is ok? (just to understand you right) i thought about the Geopriv working group or its designated successor. ciao hannes > > Bye, Frank > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf