on 2006-01-11 22:02 Bob Braden said the following: > *> From: "Brian Rosen" <br@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > *> To: "'Paul Hoffman'" <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx>, <ietf@xxxxxxxx> > *> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:13:35 -0500 > > > > *> The RFC editor has some problems which have not, to my knowledge, > *> been enumerated. > *> > > Your knowledge is apparently incomplete. The RFC Editor has been > actively experimenting with using xml2rfc for publication, and we have > been passing our problems along to the tools team. As we get more > experience, new ones show up. There is not currently a version of > xml2rfc that meets our needs. Some of our editors do the major > editing in XML, but they find it most efficient and effective to > switch to nroff for the final cleanup of the (ASCII) document format. This must be a different tools team than the IETF Tools-team. We've not seen any such feedback. Presumably you mean the xml2rfc maintainers? Although in that case it's a bit disappointing that this feedback then must have been passed along in private, rather than on the xml2rfc mailing list - I've not noticed such there. It would have been instructive to see the feedback on the list in order to better understand what would make things easier in the RFC editing work. Henrik (for the Tools team) _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf