on 2006-01-11 23:00 Ned Freed said the following: >> *> From: "Brian Rosen" <br@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> *> To: "'Paul Hoffman'" <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx>, <ietf@xxxxxxxx> >> *> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:13:35 -0500 > > > >> *> The RFC editor has some problems which have not, to my knowledge, >> *> been enumerated. >> *> > >> Your knowledge is apparently incomplete. The RFC Editor has been >> actively experimenting with using xml2rfc for publication, and we have >> been passing our problems along to the tools team. As we get more >> experience, new ones show up. There is not currently a version of >> xml2rfc that meets our needs. Some of our editors do the major >> editing in XML, but they find it most efficient and effective to >> switch to nroff for the final cleanup of the (ASCII) document format. > > Rather than sending such suggestions to the IETF tools team, why not bring them > up on the xml2rfc list? Given that I don't see names like "Charles Levert" and > "Julian Reschke" and "Marshall Rose" on the current tools team list, I'm a > little concerned that certain things might be lost in process of getting them > from the tools team to the actual xml2rfc tool maintainers. I fully agree. Comments should go to the xml2rfc list. And as a matter of fact, the tools team has not received any feedback or comments from the RFC-Editor regarding the xml2rfc tool. If we had, we would have forwarded it to the xml2rfc list. Henrik _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf