Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Sam Hartman wrote:

"wayne" == wayne  <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

   wayne> Isn't the time to fix the problem now?  Before the
   wayne> experiment is run?

Can you convince the sender ID authors to do so and to change their
implementations?

I don't think the IETF or IESG could accomplish that.  If you can then
I agree we will have a better Internet.

You might not be able to accomplish that, but you need not support its
publication as RFC either. Tell them clearly that if they want their
docs published as RFC, the experiment needs to be defined so that it
does not cause interoperability problems with other experiments and
does not violate existing standards.

--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william@xxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]