> Why do you consider the TXT version to be authoritative if as you admit > the HTML version is the one that is read by reviewers and readers? I don't think that's actually true. The TXT versions are not only authoritative, they're also the ones available from official sources. And personally I find most of the HTML versions of RFCs quite annoying to read because of distracting embellishments. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf