> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Sayre [mailto:sayrer@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 5:38 PM > To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip > Cc: Tim Bray; Keith Moore; nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: I-D file formats and internationalization > > On 12/1/05, Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On a point of information, most of the references I see in existing > > RFCs are to sections in any case. > > I suspect this is because almost everyone refers to an HTML > version in informal communication. Why do you consider the TXT version to be authoritative if as you admit the HTML version is the one that is read by reviewers and readers? Meaning is the result of usage. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf