Dave Crocker wrote:
... To elaborate:Is is ever valid for a working group to want to post a new draft late in thegame, very near -- or even during -- and IETF meeting? The answer is clearly yes, which is why working groups route around the IETF's arbitrary deadline in the manner that Ned cites.So the early deadline rule does not even fix the problem it supposedly attacks.
Yes. Often people do not read the drafts until right before an IETF meeting. Most issues are raised right before an IETF meeting. I think it would be great to be able to submit fixes that will make the meeting more productive. It does no good to discuss text that almost everyone already knows has problems. -- Doug Royer | http://INET-Consulting.com -------------------------------|----------------------------- We Do Standards - You Need Standards
begin:vcard fn:Doug Royer n:Royer;Doug org:INET-Consulting.com adr:;;;;;;U.S.A email;internet:Doug@xxxxxxxxx title:CEO tel;work:866-594-8574 tel;fax:866-594-8574 note;quoted-printable:AOL: SupportUnix=0D=0A= MSN: Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=0D=0A= Yahoo: Help4Unix x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://Royer.com version:2.1 end:vcard
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf