Last Call: 'Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR): The Internet Address Assignment and Aggregation Plan' to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> <draft-ietf-grow-rfc1519bis-03.txt> as a Proposed Standard

That's an interesting document - at least for me, because I
didn't know most of the nine obsoleted RfCs.

Does it intentionally avoid 2119 keywords ?  There's a "MUST"
in 5.1, a "should NOT" in 5, and somewhere I saw another "must"
which could be a 2119 MUST.

There might be a few typos in the text above the ASCII art in
6.1, s/RA/PA/ and s/RB/PB/ (?)

For the difference between C4 and C5 a pointer could help:  The
text and RfC 1519 apparently say that C5 should also explicitly
show up on the left side (PA) like C4, not only on the right
side (PB).  There's no erratum for 1519, probably I just miss
some clue about "primary" vs. "secondary", or "aggregation".

                          Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]