In message <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B15508A47F75@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx om>, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" writes: >> > >Let me repeat, that as far as I know, the RFC editor does NOT have >.xml versions of the FINAL RFC. They always end up generating .nroff >files and do some tailoring/editing to the .nroff before the final >RFC gets produced (from .nroff). I'd sure like to see some comments from the RFC editor on what they'd like, and what it would mean to them if everything came in in XML. I've written all of my RFCs in nroff, though I've been contemplating switching to XML. If we adopt some new format, though, I think we really need the ability to generate diffs of different versions of the same document. Today, I use wdiff; the RFC editor also uses wdiff during the auth48 period. I've never seen a pdfdiff; we might want a tool that takes two XML input documents and generates a diff.XML file that, when rendered, shows something like wdiff produces today. --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf