I very much like the new schedule, i.e., I like the idea that
we are done at some point with the official agenda and can have
dinner discussions without rush and evening meetings that start
before 22:00. This helps with and without jet-lag (I had both
versions now) and should improve quality...
That said, doing a morning of 2h+1h slot followed by lunch and
then something similar in the afternoon before the coffee break
is probably a good idea.
I have also heard from numerous people that they are often late
due to the 10 min breaks. 15 minutes would probably be better.
Having coffee available all day long would indeed be nice.
And it would be even nicer if the dark warmish liquid the hotel
serves would at least attempt to even remotely resemble coffee.
Cheers,
Joerg
It seems to me that it
might be more productive to, e.g., cut the current
morning slot to two hours and insert an hour slot in the
morning.
yes.
Ditto.
Maybe we need to ask Ray and Marcia to see if
a guideline that we don't have two consecutive ten
minute breaks could be made to work.
At the least, make short breaks 15 minutes.
Were the schedule generally less dense, making all breaks 30 minutes
would make sense, to leave real time for the followup discussions.
The latter sounds preferable but may be unworkable. One of the reasons
I'm unhappy is that I used to have four opportunities to meet with
folks: lunch, coffee, dinner, after the late session. Now I have three:
lunch, break, dinner. This makes it a bit harder for me. Extending the
10 minute break to 30 would be quite valuable, imo.
Regardless, breaks of 10, 15, or 30 minutes should include coffee.
--aaron
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf