Cual es? Si el Last Call fue correcto en la primera vez, tiene ningun discordanica? O aun dice que el Last Call no tiene razon? Presenta dos declaraciones, pero los dos finjan que el otro no exista. Parece que el EEUU es mal pase lo que pase. Es posible que eso es su punto? (Which is it? If the Last Call was correct the first time, would you have no complaint? Or still would you say the Last Call is wrong? You have stated two arguments which pretend the other doesn't exist. It seems the US is evil no matter what. Is it possible that this is really your point?) -Alexis On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Eduardo Mendez wrote: ::Mr. Noel, ::I am sorry. There is nothing nationalism. ::(Which nationalism?) :: ::The IETF is a subsidiary of ISOC. ::It is incorporated in a country (USA? Swiss?) ::This country seems to authorize what others do not. :: ::IANAL but I advise Governments. ::It is always difficult in cases where laws conflict. ::I am only interested in technical RFC 3683 things. ::If it permits this it is wrong for the IETF. That is all. :: ::Eduardo Mendez. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf