Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:

Michael Mealling writes:
Well, I didn't want to get into specifics but from what I've seen a URI
with a service identifier tag seems to be fine for everyone that has
looked a the problem.... So you shouldn't be nervous, the web seems to
be working just fine....

What do URIs not have now that they need?
As the result of a service lookup they only need something that identifies the class and subclass of the service the URI is an identifier for...

See the various specs that use NAPTR records for some examples of how the Service field is used...

-MM


--
Michael Mealling                  Masten Space Systems, Inc.
VP Business Development                       473 Sapena Ct.
Office: +1-678-581-9656                            Suite 23
Cell: +1-678-640-6884                 Santa Clara, CA 95054
                http://masten-space.com/



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]