On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 05:15:05PM +0200, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote: > I'm interested to know whether people would see arguments for > either or both of > > 1. An IETF Ombudsman (or Ombudscommittee), to act as a dispute > mediator. Good idea. These disputes take a lot of care and interested parties are often not willing or able to put the time into them that they need. "Discussion" can get abrupt and counterproductive. Even the very existence of an ombudsman will ensure that parties approach a dispute more carefully. > 2. An IETF "netiquette" committee, to offload list banning procedures > from the IESG. I don't think so. I prefer that this responsibility stay with a few individuals, so that it is taken very seriously -- not only by them but by everyone. A committee would lead to dilution of responsibility as well as endless discussion on every dispute. swb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf