Steve writes: > Actually, 3683 specifically requires community discussion of motions to > block someone's posting rights. It is, in so many words, done by a > Last Call. > Steve, I thought that RFC3683 is intended to apply "drastic measures" (see intro, page 4). RFC2418 allows a WG chair and the ADs to also take measures if someone is disrupting WG progress (sect 3.2). I certainly hope that we do not have to have the equivalent of an "IETF Last Call" everytime that a WG chair or AD finds that an individual is disrupting normal WG process. Bert _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf