Sorry, Spell Checkers Gone Wild. > So, do you propose that we withdraw the specification of the initial > registry contents, all 963 tags and subtags, and replace it with a set > of instructions to IAN on how they can duplicate our work? And cross s/IAN/IANA/ > our fingers that they get it right, or prepare to go through > item-languages for any correctible errors or omissions they may s/Item/ietf/ s/correctible/correctable/ > introduce, and live with the uncorrectable errors? Just wondering. I don't know why my spell checker corrected "uncorrectible" to "uncorrectable" but left "correctible" uncorrected. -- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf