John C Klensin <john dash ietf at jck dot com> wrote: > Then an instruction to the RFC Editor could be included in the > I-D asking that they not publish the initialization document > until the entries have been made in the IANA registry and then > that the list of entries be dropped and replaced with a pointer > paragraph and reference. That would lead to an RFC that was > clearly informational and fairly short, saving everyone > long-term problems. The whole purpose of draft-initial is to serve as the vehicle by which the initial registry contents are transmitted to IANA. That was what the co-chairs and group thought best. There would be no need for a separate initialization document otherwise. -- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf