RE: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 11:29 05/09/2005, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Christian Huitema wrote:
LLMNR does not create additional DNS queries.
However, as folks have pointed out, having a lookup mechanism which can also use real FQDN's has benefits compared to just restricting to .local. The more difficult problem is being able to separate "really owned FQDN" from "invented, bogus FQDN"... while not making the problem worse by creating even more DNS traffic.

This mechanism would work on a list of TLDs to compare with. May be the proper place to introduce a full TLD service where a istld(tld) function would return a null string if it did not exist and the proper tld to use otherwise. This would enforce a strict TLD aliasing able to support an internationalised version of the existing TLDs for full ML.ML names.

That function could be extended to isdn(dn.tld) where the dn could be nullified if it did use only characters from the TLD associated charset. This would address the homograph problem, since TLD Managers can decide of their TLD charsets, but cannot impose them beyond their own registration level.

jfc



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]