Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>
> Flight of imagination: DNSSEC-Signed records (with the SIG/KEY chain in
> additional data?) would seem to be one possibility to "prove" that the data
> being presented was "legitimate" under DNS delegation rules, even when you
> don't have a present connection to the Internet.

How can you verify the signature without an Internet connection with which
to fetch the key?

Why does it make sense to strive for globally-unique names when all that
matters is uniqueness on the local link?

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot@xxxxxxxx>  http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]