On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 20:08 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > The difference between LLMNR and mDNS here seems to be that mDNS *requires* > me to use two different names in the two different cases; LLMNR, while it > certainly *permits* me to do so, does not *require* it. Can I read this as "LLMNR SHOULD be used with domains in the .local domain" ? Which puts it really in the same baliwick as mDNS (that is the version that existed before that draft was written with the name mdns ;) One can of course easily remove the check for the .local from the real mDNS and use it for anything else too. Just change the MUST into a SHOULD in the draft and everybody is happy. Greets, Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf