Keith Moore writes: > LLMNR isn't a competitor to mDNS. They attempt to address different > problems. We see to be living in some kind of Alice Through the Looking Glass world here. The llmnr drafts are even called `-mdns-' ! > I favor adoption of LLMNR because in a world of disconnected and > intermittently connected networks there's a need for applications to > still be able to work - and being able to "work" includes being able to > lookup the same DNS names that the applications would normally use in a > connected network. This is not what people are trying to deploy it for, and it is distinctly unclear that LLMNR is at all the right answer for this problem. Ian. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf