On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Frank Ellermann wrote: > > > incompatible with RFC2822 > > I'm still a bit lost how this could actually _break_ something. > For obvious reasons the author can't say "updates 2822", how > should he fix it ? As you said the 822 issue is mentioned in > the senderid-pra draft. Regarding RFC 822, the S-ID draft doesn't mention the fact that a large proportion of software which does something useful with Resent- headers still implements the 822 syntax, not the 2822 syntax. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR GOOD. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf