In message <C2D94E2C-6180-4AB7-B44F-CEFF8646F25B@xxxxxx>, Marc Manthey writes: > >> >> i'm going to have to raise the point that Peters "root-server" >> system >> is his private "walled-garden" and not representative of the >> Internet's >> authoritative root servers. Just for clarification. >> >> --bill > > >i want to correct bills concern that , " peters public root server >system" is >an alternative for the existing ones and there are several others . > > At the risk of starting down a tangent, the IETF does not, as a technical matter, accept the validity of so-called alternate roots. See RFC 2826. --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf