Re: "IETF servers aren't for testing"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeroen Massar wrote:

The problem here seems to be more the fact that, in the US, getting IPv6
connectivity can be quite tiresome. Cogent, the current IPv4 upstream,
doesn't do IPv6 (they have 2001:500:2::/48) for instance. UUnet could
maybe do IPv6. Maybe the secretariat would wants to try out some tunnels?

If connectivity means a colocated server with IPv4 and IPv6 service,
that can easially be found in the US.  Finding an IPv6 ISP POP in
an arbitrary local town is quite a bit more difficult.

If these are just dedicated/colocated servers and IPv6 is a requirement,
move them to a hosting company that supports IPv6. If you are not
willing to take your business elsewhere then why should your current
hosts offer it?

- Kevin

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]