On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 07:35, Sam Hartman wrote: > BTW, this conversation and a side conversation with John has convinced > me that IESG review should involve a call for comments phase. A call for comments requires having something for the community to comment on. Will an internet draft will be required from folks seeking IESG review of a proposed assignment, or will we invent yet another mechanism for circulating a description of the proposal to the community? - Bill _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf